My experience with both is summarized below. I recently switched back to using a Garmin watch for this reason, since I don't need to deal with any tags. Reading through the "is GG dead" thread, I saw a comment that said something like (paraphrasing) shot tracking systems provides a nice set of golf memories, and this really resonated with me because after 1.5 years using Garmin and then 3 years using ShotScope, I never really use the advanced stats> But I do really like having shot tracking/mapping to visualize previous rounds. The GPS accuracy is equivalent for both systems. These are both watch-based, and I personally don't mind wearing a watch while playing golf.
I would recommend both Garmin and ShotScope, but with reservations. If this topic is too similar to other topics here (I see a Game Golf and Arccos thread already), please remove it mods. Garmin - Also a watch, don't really know too much about this option.įor people who use one of the above (or one I didn't list), would you recommend it? What are some pros/cons of each? V3 fixes these issues but is obviously more expensive. V2 is bulky and less accurate, but only $100. Shot Scope - The shot tracking is done through a gps watch. I don't care for the automatic shot tracking, and more expensive than Game Golf Live. Haven't heard great things about Game Golf Pro.Īrccos - Also seemingly does what I want. I would get this if I knew it would be supported into the future. Game Golf - Game Golf Live seemingly does what I want, but it appears that users in the Game Golf thread are having trouble with it recently. I want one to better analyze my own game, get a better handle on my shot zones (shout out LSW), and figure out where I'm losing the most strokes. I'm in the market for a shot tracker and having a ton of trouble figuring out what's right for me.
0 kommentar(er)
